
I'm new here, but here's something I had not considered. Got to thinking about while watching my neighbor spray his crops last year. Did some searching, and I found out that spraying chemicals/fertilizers on crops has gotten to be incredibly high tech. The amount of chemicals can be flow regulated to a very precise degree. Not affiliated in any way, but here's an expample I stumbled upon to give you an idea of what I'm talking about - SpraySmarter . Notice they don't tout the green possibilities of this technology. Could advocating for increased use of this tech cut down considerably on farm related pollution? I think so. Maybe other industrial applications too. Food for thought.

Can anyone provide a list of certified LEED indoor air quality test companies in the Houston area?
We were contacted by a Houston-based commercial HVAC company that is completing work on a city-owned building. This will be a referral directly to this potential client. Contact me at:
richard@eastandassociates.com

Is anyone actually "for" the exposure to asbestos, lead paint dust and on top of that, wasting energy? I would slyly answer is yes. A few building owners and tenants have expressed frustration to me that they can't get rid of their asbestos/lead paint dust contaminated windows due to onerous historic preservation regulations. I am all for preserving historical stuff that is in decent condition to begin with. But come on, stuff that is in poor condition and is unsafe has no real historical value. Mesothelioma and child lead poisoning is a part of U.S.history I would just as soon forget.
Wondering if anyone has had success get an overide or appeal of historical preservation ordinances based on asbestos and/or lead risk?

Wondering if anyone has tried using the Innov-X XRF Lead Inspector series for HUD lead work and how it has worked for them. With the rental cost being almost half of the Niton, I am thinking that it is worth it to go through the additional substrate correction and data validation hassles, at least for smaller projects with a one-day rental charge to the project ( understanding that some inconclusives may also have to be dealt with by paint chip sampling). Will share my experience after I finish the project I am trying this on if anyone is interested in discussing.

Draft of an article to be submitted for publication asserting my arguments why the concept of doing a Lead Inspection and Risk Assessment simultaneously is out-dated and ill-advised in most cases. If you have a soundbite or anecdote that fits, let me known and I might give you some run in the article. Also interested in any critical comments or thoughts.


By Tony Nocito and Tiluna Nocito
In ancient China a physician, who had two brothers, also physicians, was asked by a lord, which of you is the most skilled in the art of healing? Why my oldest brother of course.
The lord asked why he is the most skilled. Because he sees illness before it happens and cures it, therefore no one knows of him.
And your second oldest brother, how does he cure illness? He cures illness when it is still small and has not left the neighborhood. Therefore he is only known only by our neighbors.
And you, the lord asked? I treat illness when it is advanced so all know of me.
As the first paragraph depicts, the brother who cures illness before it happens is the superior physician and as the last paragraph depicts, the brother who treats illness when it is advanced, is well-known.
Today, our environmental awareness and conciseness to save our earth, therefore saving ourselves, are diligently, and as financially possible, moving in the direction of the first brother who treats illness before it happens. Illness, for this blog, is the metaphor for environmental waste and pollution.
Industry, over the past two centuries, has created negative externality, which they have become cognizant of over the past 30± years. Industry was the “classic example of a negative externality: pollution, generated by some productive enterprise, and affecting others who had no choice and were probably not taken into account” (about.com).
For its own gain, industry has used substances that were known carcinogens, asbestos being the most widely used, known and publicized, sickening and killing multitudes who have worked in industry or government that used asbestos in their products.
The use of asbestos has caused one of the greatest world-wide industrial tragedies in all of history.
Asbestos has polluted entire towns through mining the six minerals, subsequently using these asbestos minerals in over 5,000 asbestos containing products around the world.
The polluters are well-known. They have allowed the advanced pollution to get out of the house and out of the neighborhood, becoming infamous to all; costing them billions of dollars in revenues, i.e. bankruptcy lawyers, legal fees to defend lawsuit and large cash settlements, as well as causing a negative impact on their image and the products they manufacture. They have tied up the courts and have caused high-cost medical expenses paid for, by guess who, the Tax Payer.
This is not only true with asbestos, but many other pollutants that would require more than this page to list.
The polluters are the older brothers who are now trying to cure the illness (pollution) after it has left the neighborhood.
We, as a society, are starting to drive ourselves towards the first brother’s philosophy: cure the illness before it happens.
How are we doing this? Through sustainable thinking and sustainable action, sustainable industrial production, renewable energy, positive use of closed landfills, i.e. methane gas recapture, wind farm placement, setting up solar panels on closed landfills, waste to energy facilities being built where a landfill stood, land conservation, food composting, practicing the 3Rs, recycle, reuse and reduce, constantly striving for zero waste, and all growing from our understanding and necessity that we must save ourselves and our planet, yes must.
We are working to undo something that has taken well over two centuries to create, slowly working ourselves into being the middle brother, industry is striving for zero waste from production of their products, our recycling, waste treatment and conservation efforts are preventing less waste not to leave the neighborhood.
I watched a documentary film produced by Sage Environmental, which makes a solid case that everything is recyclable and that it is up to us to emphasize and implement recycling. The film starts by making the statement: everything in nature is recycled; emphasizing examples that nature recycles itself, and that with a conscious effort we can do the same.
In this mix of environmental problems our population is growing and our need for space is expanding, leaving less and less of earth’s area to put trash that no one wants in their back yard.
We are making tremendous progress in dealing with waste. We are making tremendous progress in our recycling and conservation efforts. Recycle, reduce and reuse is the natural solution to our waste problems.
If we think of recycling as the seatbelt of our planet, we will become more and more aware of the benefits for us and our environment.
Think about it, when seat belt regulations were implemented, most thought it would be a hassle to buckle up. But once we started to use the seatbelt, it became consciously impossible to first buckle up; then drive off.
THINK: every time we begin to discard something we ask ourselves--- can I or someone use this again? The answer should be yes.
Industry is becoming very aware of sustainability and the reuse of waste from production, as well as the importance of land conservation. Many are announcing their ability to create zero waste.
We support their efforts to conserve by buying their products.
But what about the wastes that makes us ill, like asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls PCBs, heavy metals, chromium, lead, and other environmental pollutants. How do we constructively take them out of our environment? ---- One word: Technology.
Treatment of advanced illness takes research and development of new medicines and implementation of technology.
Commitment by industry that has the problems of harmful and lethal environmental pollutants in their factories, facilities, landfills and Superfund Sites should utilize existing technologies and through research and development create new technologies.
This will be the only way industry will become the first doctor.
The positive image using technology to rid our environment of hazardous pollutants will make them the most skilled and they will only be known by efforts of good sustainable- environmental practices of preventing future illness before it happens.
Forum:
I'd like to know the safest and most cost effective way to avoid damaging underground utilities on drilling projects. I have found there are many great alternatives, but each has its downside.
Here are some examples:
1. Public Utility Locates: Locates performed by public utility locating contractors typically only include accessible areas on a site, and often only to a utility meter or to the edge of an obstructing fence or building. Not every locator is the same. Sometimes locate personnel wrongly locate utilities, or even at the wrong property (due inappropriate address information, etc.) Often public locates don't show up within the mandated 48 hour timeframes. Due to low cost and the regulatory requirement to call before you dig, this is a must at any site.
2. Private Utility Locates: Locates performed by private locating contractors are often completed of utilities that are obvious and where there is a spot where a signal can be induced by standard locating equipment. This process can result in overlooking certain utilities, and often these private contractors are not allowed to locate public utilities, even if they're obvious. Still, because standard public locates can end at certain inconvenient points, it seems like a must.
3. Ground Penetrating Radar, Magnetometer Surveys, and Witching: Locates performed using GPR or magnetometers, and even witching raise a comfort level, but don't always detect underground fiberglass piping in clay or dense substrates. This is often a problem at gasoline station sites. Further, GPR can be expensive and may not be available on bare and undulated ground with standard surveying equipment. It is uncomfortably remarkable that witching detects anything, but it I have seen it work. Not willing to bet my paycheck on it yet.
4. As-Built Drawings: Great to obtain these if they exist, but they're not always accurate. Further, sometimes an iteration of new utilities are missing from older drawings, and visa versa. Hard to depend upon these, but reviewing them is a must if they exist.
5. Vactor Truck/Air Knife Use: Suctioning using a vactor truck or an air knife to a five-foot depth is the best method I have found to clear holes of utilities anywhere, and especially at gasoline stations. Problem is, it's expensive, leads to a lot of IDW, can limit shallow sampling, and can undermine pavement or structures when the substrate consists of sand or pea-gravel (backfill). It won't work if your strata includes large cobbles greater than three-four inches across. Seems like a must for fueling station sites with shallow fiberglass piping.
6. Contractual Protection and Insurance: Conditions in contracts indicating that the consultant is not on the hook for damages to utilities often don't work, especially with small work -- and can be a tough part of contractual negotiations for any work. This is because a client can withhold payment to pay for repairs, and it'll often cost more to pursue legal action than to just pay to fix the problem. Plus, one can lose a client. Insurance is a necessity, but seems like it costs more to pay higher premiums (after notifying insurance) than to just fix the problem.
7. Camera Use: When utilities are accessible, this seems like a good option as locate personnel can use remote cameras to determine JETs in piping and can locate the path of the camera using standard locating equipment from the top. However, not all utilities are accessible -- or even known to exist in certain areas. This is also an expensive option, and the utilities have to be large enough for the camera, etc. Sometimes this is completed alongside dye testing to show connectivity.
8. Contingencies: This is one area I have yet to explore. Seems like one could designate a 10K contingency (limit) on any project for damages to utilities and then relinquish that portion of their overall fee during final billing after no utilities have been damaged. Seems like government clients might greatly appreciate this one.
9. Locating Form: This would be a form that locating contractors, the consultant, and property owners/clients could sign on site right after locates have been completed and prior to drilling. The form would have everyone acknowledge that prudent steps have been undertaken to investigate for the presence of utilities and to demarcate utilities, that nobody is aware of the presence of utilities at each of the proposed boring positions, and that repair of damages are the responsibility of the client.
10. Historical Information and Interviews: I have found it handy to interview former and current site owners and long-time resident neighbors when I can get a bead on utilities. Certainly a decent Phase I with lots of close-up historical aerials and detailed historical property uses can help, too.
11. FYI -- on Health and Safety Plans, I have found it VERY handy to list the OneCall contact number, the utility locate ticket number, plus a list of all of the utilities known to exist on site, and contact numbers for each utility. Why is this not standard protocol? If you like this option -- call it the Welge rule and send me five bucks each time you do this. I need to get rich somehow.
I don't suspect there are any magic bullets here. Seems like the public/private locates and possibly the vactor truck/air knife options are the best standard options, in the absence of all other information.
Any thoughts on the matter are greatly appreciated!
Thank you for reading this post!

Let's say you are hired by a property owner to follow up on a Phase I, and you conduct a soil assessment and find high concentrations of PCE/TCE in shallow soil. The source is a former dry cleaner, which ceased operation over 10 years ago. The owner of the property plans on informing the current tennants, but hasn't said anything about informing the local regulatory agencies, or conducting any additional assessment.
Is it your responsibility as an environmental professional to inform the local agencies? How do you convince the owner to do the right thing so that you can keep working on the project?

On Sept 30, the EPA issued a new guideline on handling PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) in caulking in many buildings constructed or renovated between 1950 and 1978.
This has been a known environmental issue for some time, with not much activity/enforcement that I’m aware of in most regions of the U.S.
EPA recommends implementing steps to minimize exposure, including additional cleaning and ventilation, air duct cleaning, testing peeling, brittle, cracking or deteriorating caulk directly for the presence of PCBs and removing the caulk if PCBs are present at significant levels. EPA also recommends that building owners and facility managers should consider testing to determine if PCB levels in the air exceed EPA’s suggested public health levels. If testing reveals PCBs in the air above these levels, building owners should be especially vigilant in implementing and monitoring ventilation and hygienic practices to minimize exposures.
So when you are doing this type of testing for a client are you doing soil, bulk, and dust sampling in conjunction with your air sampling?

The following is the abstract of an article I am hoping to publish that makes the case for doing more than the HUD-prescribed bare minimum for lead paint testing for Multi-family Residential Properties.
Criticisms/comments welcome.