EPA was a great resource to us when drafting the Guide. EPA had input at several stages throughout the process, and like all the members, provided great comments and insights to help make the Guide as good as it can be.
I have no indication whether EPA will recognize our Guide like they did with E1527 -- obviously I'd love it if EPA did recognize the Guide in the rule. However, since this is the first generation of thinking on these issues, I suspect that like 1527 (which existed long before EPA incorporated it into the AAI rule), later generations of the document might be more likely to be incorporated by EPA than this one. Others may have a different view however. Feel free to share!
Comment
EPA was a great resource to us when drafting the Guide. EPA had input at several stages throughout the process, and like all the members, provided great comments and insights to help make the Guide as good as it can be.
I have no indication whether EPA will recognize our Guide like they did with E1527 -- obviously I'd love it if EPA did recognize the Guide in the rule. However, since this is the first generation of thinking on these issues, I suspect that like 1527 (which existed long before EPA incorporated it into the AAI rule), later generations of the document might be more likely to be incorporated by EPA than this one. Others may have a different view however. Feel free to share!
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this