
Chapter 453 of the Acts of 2008 requires that every insurance carrier in MA offer homeowner's insurance coverage to include remediation, assessment, property damage, third party claims and defense costs for releases of oil from oil tanks, fuel lines, pipes, equipment, or systems connected to the fuel tank.
$50,000 per occurrence for on-site (first party costs) and $200,000 for third party claims is the mandatory offering.
Why is this important?
First, over 300 residential fuel oil spills are reported annually to the MassDEP. When groundwater is involved costs can average $250,000 or more. That amount can be catastrophic to the average homeowner.
Second, lenders that foreclose on properties can use the policy to pay for unwanted cleanups - See Larry Schnapf's post on Southbridge Savings Bank incurring $4,000 by foreclosing on residential home with oil leakage.
Comment
Does the act make a distinction betwwen claims-made and occurence policies? What are they typical premiums for the mandatory offering?
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Most homeowner's policies are on occurrence forms. Attached is a Prestige Sample Endorsement and separately a rate form from Fireman's Fund. The rates look to be between $124-$500.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
all the more reason to distribute natural gas in MA.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
So you can have house explosions and higher heating bills.... You should read about all the National Grid man-hole explosions in greater Boston area.
I am all for natural gas (see LINN Energy for good stock tip). But it never seems to be one clear answer.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
We're doing a remediation job for a trailer park co-op where one of the homes' AST leaked for a unknown period of time. The tank was in a concrete basin, but the basin leaked too. The release was discovered last summer. So far we have a 16' deep hole and recurring GW contamination in fractured bedrock, within the protective radius of the trailer parks' water supply wells. If we still have GW contamination above drinking water standards by our one-year date in October, the site will default to a Tier 1 (direct DEP oversight) release, which will be expensive.
The co-op corporation that owns the place is picking up the bill at the moment, but their pockets aren't very deep-- this is an over-55 community.
Granted, this isn't a typical homeowner problem, but it's a good example of how bad things can get. Outdoor ASTs for residences are a bad, bad idea.
I'm trying to accrue Good Karma Points by instructing the residents there on how to inspect their tanks, etc. to try to help prevent this from happening again. As it is, in 1998 the co-op required all the residents to either replace their tanks or install a basin.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
This is interesting news. I am a homeowner in MA myself.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this