
I have been quiet on the blogging front lately because frankly, there haven’t been that many great things to write about. However, one thing that has continued to bother me is whether our economy is able to be accurately assessed right now. I say this because without the support of the recent government handouts, the economy doesn’t appear to be sustainable. Here is what I mean.
I have followed the Small Business Administration and how it has assisted small businesses for many years and traditionally, it has been a great place for small business to go when a traditional lender might not want to extend a loan to that business. It was a place that a business went when it wasn’t a great fit for a traditional loan and was accompanied by higher fees and a more complex process. But it had a purpose - to fill a void/need in the market. Well, every month now, it appears that another bailout is required for SBA to keep lending money to small businesses and now they removed the fees. Businesses are getting the benefits of receiving money on a riskier loan wiithout any repercussions. It almost seems like the SBA could become the “subprime” commercial loan marketplace if this trend continues…after all, who else guarantees at 90%?
As an entrepreneur, this is attractive. However, as a citizen and taxpayer, it scares me. I don’t see anything else propping up the economy when the government doesn’t intervene. In many ways, the Federal Government is “bailing out” small business with borrowed money of their own to try to increase employment. Yet studies show that companies are not hiring until they are sure that the economy is fully recovered. And many small business owners are now saying that the SBA should lend directly because the banks aren't lending the SBA allocated money to them. My gut tells me that those businesses are not able to get loans due to traditional credit issues and are looking for a handout.
So my question is, where should money be used? Should it be to sustain the things that we already traditionally allocate taxes for within existing budgets or should it be a pseudo "venture capital" fund to create new businesses that somehow aren’t qualified to get a traditional loan (using borrowed money)? Either way, the money to pay for all of this will be coming from the remaining successful businesses and individuals via tax increases, as well as from a continued stream of loans to the government. And many experts seem to think that China, the source of much of this borrowed money, is sitting on a significant financial bubble right now which might prompt them to look for a payout sooner than we expect.
So, my feeling is that if the U.S. Economy doesn't find a way to sustain itself, we will never really know where the economy truly stands.
Comments
Stimulus money should, IMO, be spent where government traditionally spends its money - infrastructure, defense, etc. Handing out money like this to questionable small businesses is not likely to result in jobs creation that is meaningful or sustainable.
With that being said, I'm making plans to seek some of those funds myself, on some questionable ventures of my own. Wish me luck!
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
It is definitely a tricky situation and even in this morning's WSJ there is an article about how credit is opening up for only the larger firms yet the smaller firms are still being left out in the cold. But there is also mention of other countries taking their medicine and making sure the true bottom is being hit.
However, if the money is there, we would be crazy not to try to get use out of it at that point. Good luck Max (depending how questionable they are of course :-)).
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Great points Derek. Today's WSJ has another article 100% on point with your thoughts, "Loan Squeeze Thwarts Small Business Rival."
The article 'tells the tale' of how 108 year-old company (small biz) in Michigan would be able to create 20 jobs if it could the lending it needed. However, the type of business (manufactures ladders) and it's recent credit issues all but preclude the big banks from lending to him. His local community bank - Bank of Ann Arbor - expressed concerns over the company's downturn in 2008 (in was in turn connected to other small business - like a local developer that would have bought the ladders but his development went out from under him).
The article also discussed your bigger point of whether the governmental 'stimulus' to encourage community banks to lend is going to work.
Ironically, on the one hand the White House and some of the regulators are saying lend - on the other hand - the same banking regulators are scrutinizing lending while the Senate is proposing stricter federal guidelines.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Ed,
You just saved me a few moments because I was actually going to mention that article today. The article reinforces several things I have been saying for a while...that regulators in Washington and examiners in the field are not playing with the same rule book...I have spoken to so many lenders over the past 6 months or so that have indicated this...the examiners are worried about missing something so they are still insisting that lenders, especially community banks, properly capitalize their balance sheet despite the reprieve that Washington insists they have instituted.
The other thing, which I will probably expand upon soon, is that the community banks are starting to see more competition from the larger institutions again...and the ironic thing is that while the SBA Stimulus money is meant to help small businesses (which it might do), it is really going to drive the volume to the larger lenders with sophisticated SBA departments. I don't think we are that far off with the pendulum starting to shift back to the bigger banks.
I am sure this will be a major discussion point for Community Banks this week.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
I could list about 25 Reagan speech links right now but I won't.
The fact the White House and Banks are arguing over lending % distribution and balance sheets speaks for itself.
Derek- To answer your first point, it's not sustainable, and when the printing presses shut down the weakness of current policy will be exposed.
Cut taxes.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Ronald Reagan, camouflage and fishing. God bless.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Adding you to my friends list right now.........
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Well, while it is quite easy to start talking about the political ramifications and issues here, but I am refraining from that. My point was more about the use of the money that was allocated with the stimulus package. If we assume that horse is out of the barn (i.e. stimulus approved by Senate), my issue is still how to spend it. Much like businesses that were profitable are shoring up their own companies and trying to get stronger during the downturn, that is what I think the stimulus should be for.
Why not solidify the foundation and infrastructure so when things get better, the small businesses will have a better starting point with more chance for success? In my opinion, now is not the time for wholesale changes to existing policy or proved ways of making policy when we don't even know when this will be over and how much it will cost. I think I am once again concurring with MaxEng's point. And if Erik's comments come true, then at least our foundation will have been strengthened.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Why spend? Approvals by the Senate can be repealed. Grab the horse by the reins, open the barn door and put him back in. Pay off debt. Simple right? Haven't we already proved that throwing around $ out of (secret) gov't slush funds doesnt work? If they fail it's for a reason, sometimes things need to fail to be corrected. Free market capitalism. Cut taxes.
Oh and don't refrain from the political issues because this is all about politics.
E
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
It always confuses me how paying down debt and cutting taxes could both happen simultaneously in this economic climate.
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
I was thinking about this blog from the spring and unfortunately, many of the things raised are happening now. Here is one example of when the SBA funding dries up. I am curious what members think is going to be the "thing" that pushes the economy forward that doesn't involve stimulus money...
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=23592313&gid=121893&trk=EML_anet_qa_ttle-d7hOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA
Reply to this Comment
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this