
My local print and TV media has been so utterly consumed by looking at the Yale murder case from every possible angle, that it's a wonder I even saw this headline last week:
U.S. Indicts Cheshire Man, His Environmental Business and an Employee
This isn't the kind of publicity any environmental firm wants. Last week, the owner of Earth Technology, a local environmental firm here in Connecticut that does site development and remediation work, was charged in a 19-point federal indictment. He, along with one of his employees, are also facing charges of conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering. Seems they allegedly attempted to defraud the developer of a NY shopping mall by submitting inflated invoices for the removal of contaminated soil. According to the indictment:
This wasn't the company's first brush with the law, either. In 2005, our state Attorney General referred to Earth Technology as "Exhibit A" for the need to reform the way Connecticut awards contracts to private companies. Why? Because at the time they'd received more than $1 million in business from the state DEP at a time when they also did $75,000 in free or discounted work at the homes of two environmental agency employees.
Now, due to the recent charges, Earth Technology might have to kiss any state business goodbye. Connecticut's Attorney General Blumenthal was recently quoted as saying, "The state must consider closely and promptly whether this company should be receiving state business; indeed, whether it can be a state contractor."
But, losing state contracts isn't their biggest worry right now. The penalty for their $300k soil contamination disposal scheme? Maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison for the owner and an employee. And the firm faces a fine of up to $9.5 million if convicted.
The company's website boasts that the company was listed in Engineering News Record's list of Top 200 environmental firms, although it doesn't appear in the 2009 list. It also claims to be currently ranked in the top three environmental firms in Connecticut in the Business New Haven "Environmental Remediation and Consulting Firms" issue. If these charges from the alleged scheme to defraud the mall developer are proven, there could soon be one fewer soil removal contractor in this state.
Comment
Disgusting lack of ethics. Why do these folks never assume they'll get caught?
Average Rating:



1 rating
|
Sign in to rate this
You might be mixing Earth Technology with the much larger and more reputable Earth Tech Inc. when you reference information on their website.
Earth Tech Inc. became part of AECOM in 2008.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Thx for your comment. The claim I'm referencing was definitely made by the co. involved in the lawsuit, Earth Technology, which is based here in CT. My guess is that the claim on their website just refers to a past year's ENR 200 list:
Our versatility and comprehensive range of services have resulted in Earth Technology being named one of the "Top 200 Firms" in the United States as reported in the annual publication of Environmental Firms in Engineering News- Record. Additionally, Earth Technology is currently ranked in the top three in Connecticut among all Environmental Firms identified in the Business New Haven "Environmental Remediation and Consulting Firms " issue.
Interesting side note: AECOM jumped to 8th in the July 2009 edition from 16th a year ago, thanks to the 7/08 acquisition of Earth Tech you referenced (formerly ranked 12th).
Thanks for giving me an idea for my next blog!
Dianne
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
The local drama continues on this story.
It's a sign of today's ultra-transparent climate that that when someone's accused of a crime, the general public can weigh in for all to see. So now in this unfortunate EP's case, his reputation is being brought to the surface in readers' comments to local news coverage. Some cite what an absolute great guy he is, and others characterize him as a businessman who didn't pay his vendors and got in fistfights at his kids' sporting events.
But ultimately of course he's innocent until proven guilty.
Dianne
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
Not anymore. I wonder if we should have a discussion about the ethics of slandering the accused.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this
It is indeed a sign of the times. The proliferation of social media applications means that your character can be attacked easily and aggressively. People from your high school can post your (irrevelant?) dirt for the world to see. The takeaway: Stay ethical or you might have your Camaro-loving, fuzzy dice, ripped sweatshirt days broadcast to millions of clients and potential clients.
Be the first to rate this
|
Sign in to rate this